Well at least they didn't pick someone who looks radically different from our Kristina. Not like when they SORA'd Lulu and she went from black haired to blonde. ( Never could figure out how Luke and Laura would have a black haired kid. I also think it's not the actress's fault that she's a replacement. i'll give her a chance. ( I wonder if they'll bring back a new Ethan for her to go after again?)
The new Kristina's Ts are Ds, not Bs so C ya later GH.
So now Lexi isn't good enough and neither is Nathan Parsons...Oh my. Meet the new hybrid GH.
Hi there!)I hope you don't mind i used your site to write my homework for school. I marked your site as the sourse. An my friend ordered his on http://www.paperwritings.com/. CHEATER)))))BUt we both got A+!! Thanks for great share man!!
Karen, looks like you got spammed! haha. Anyway, at least the new actress doesn't look like a hoochie.
Not even close to D's...that said, she'd be closer to Alexis and Sam. As for the recast itself, I'm fine with it, was never that fond of Lexi Ainsworth.
Hmm. We'll see. I thought Lindsay Hartley could be a good recast/soras'd Kristina. I liked her in Passions. I miss that crazy show.
I can't help but wonder WHY???? KUDOS for not making her a hoochie.
While I am not happy about the recast, I am trying to keep an open mind. Everyone hated it when DG was let go, but Chad has done a great job with Michael. Hopefully this will work out just as well...
I am totally fine with the recast and saw the necessity of it. Lexie just looked very young for her age (which will be a fabulous asset later in life!!). Alexis Pullos/Molly is maturing rapidly and would have surely looked older than Lexie soon.
Post a Comment